Computer Science > Software Engineering
[Submitted on 16 May 2024]
Title:Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Web-Form-Test Generation: An Empirical Study
View PDFAbstract:The testing of web forms is an essential activity for ensuring the quality of web applications, which mainly involves evaluating the interactions between users and forms. Automated test-case generation remains a challenge for web-form testing: Due to the complex, multi-level structure of web pages, it can be difficult to automatically capture their inherent contextual information for inclusion in the tests. Large Language Models (LLMs) have great potential for contextual text generation. OpenAI's GPT LLMs have been receiving a lot of attention in software testing, however, they may fail to be applied in practice because of information security concerns. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative study examining different LLMs has yet been reported for web-form-test generation. To address this gap in the literature, we conducted a comprehensive empirical study investigating the effectiveness of 11 LLMs on 146 web forms from 30 open-source Java web applications. According to the experimental results, different LLMs can achieve different testing effectiveness. Notably, the GPT-4, GLM-4, and Baichuan2 LLMs can generate better web-form tests than the others. Compared with GPT-4, other LLMs find it difficult to generate appropriate tests for web forms, resulting in decreased successfully-submitted rates (SSRs, measured by the proportions of the LLMs-generated web-form tests that can be successfully inserted into the web forms and submitted) ranging from 9.10% to 74.15%. Nevertheless, some LLMs achieve higher SSRs than GPT-3.5, indicating a better ability to generate appropriate tests for web forms. Our findings also show that, for all LLMs, when the designed prompts include complete and clear contextual information about the web forms, more effective web-form tests were generated. Finally, we offer some insights for using LLMs to guide automated web-form testing.
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.